"seized the land under the law of eminent domain, through which the government can take private land for public purposes"
Yep. Imminent Domain is a fraught issue. Often the land/property seized is that of the poor, and for the benefit of the wealthy. A case can be made for the need for private property to be put to a different use for the greater good, but often this greater good looks a whole lot like corrupt intent.
Fun fact: Trump's Wall is expected to need to utilize imminent domain to seize/bisect land from many private citizens to fix a problem that these private citizens (mostly) claim hasn't been an issue for 150 years. Imminent domain is alive and well...
“I know all those people that were in the film [...] But that’s when they were young and strong and full of life, you know?”