Cdn Steve wrote:I've got a question - do you have particular shots in mind before the show, or do you shoot like mad and sift through the pile afterwards? Do you adjust your settings, position, etc to improve on the previous nights' results?
Depends a lot on the show, the venue, and what I know of the set list.
Usually I'll set a goal for myself like "Get more pictures of Jem this time," or "Try to catch Philip's 'Take my hand' motions (or 'Turkish Song of The Damned' chorus)." Honestly, though, a lot of it boils down to going from stage left to right and back again as many times as possible in twelve minutes, shooting like mad, looking for something new (James is often a great candidate for Something New). Then after-the-fact sort through a pile of shots for the few that came out nice (I'm working right now on being a harsher editor - it's a bit ridiculous to post thirty or forty shots of a twelve minute window).
One other big contributing factor is the venue itself. The Wiltern, for example, is largely a wash for me. Their photographer's coral was behind the main pit (no other venue I've been to does this), and there wasn't advanced warning. I had a nice fast wide angle lens, but some pretty crap slow telephoto lenses. Unfortunately the concert lighting and the slow lenses made for A Whole Lot Of Crap after three days of shooting. Most other venues have the photographers squished between the stage and the audience, with the security monkeys. This means dodging the monkeys, and getting a lot of shots of people's nostrils (and heavily back-lit when the light grid ends up behind their head).
Ramble ramble.
Long story short - There's a general goal in mind, but an awful lot of luck and shooting like mad.
“I know all those people that were in the film [...] But that’s when they were young and strong and full of life, you know?”