Jon wrote:I'm still reading Richard Dawkins - The God Delusion.
Sandyfromvancouver wrote:Jon wrote:I'm still reading Richard Dawkins - The God Delusion.
What's your impression so far?
Jon wrote:Sandyfromvancouver wrote:Jon wrote:I'm still reading Richard Dawkins - The God Delusion.
What's your impression so far?
I'm an atheist with a semi querying mind as far as religion goes. I don't mind skimming through the bible and I've read parts of the Bhagavad Gita - I was bought up Church Of England and apart from Primary school trips to church for the Harvest Festival my only encounters with religion have been funerals and weddings - but I'm really enjoying the arguments being put forward and Dawkins has really put some time and effort into the book and injected some real humour to make it an excellent read.
Sandyfromvancouver wrote:Jon wrote:Sandyfromvancouver wrote:Jon wrote:I'm still reading Richard Dawkins - The God Delusion.
What's your impression so far?
I'm an atheist with a semi querying mind as far as religion goes. I don't mind skimming through the bible and I've read parts of the Bhagavad Gita - I was bought up Church Of England and apart from Primary school trips to church for the Harvest Festival my only encounters with religion have been funerals and weddings - but I'm really enjoying the arguments being put forward and Dawkins has really put some time and effort into the book and injected some real humour to make it an excellent read.
I haven't read the book, but I did hear him lecture recently. I found his approach to be fundamentalist and intolerant of difference. Dawkins came off as contemptuous of anyone who disagrees with him, it seemed to me. I'm a "lapsed" Catholic, so I'm no fan of stuffed shirts in skirts. But Dawkins seemed rather similar to those he skewers.
philipchevron wrote:I don't think Dawkins would disagree that he as proselytising and intolerant in his atheism as he would accuse his detractors/subjects of being, but I feel he would argue with some justification that while he has all the forces of rationalism at his back, they do not.
Clash Cadillac wrote:The Rose & The Briar - Sean Wilentz and Greil Marcus (2005)
full URL
A devastatingly original work that plunges into the heart of the American psyche from America's beginnings to Bruce Springsteen's "Nebraska."
The ballad has been part of American history since before the country had a name. In this book, Sean Wilentz and Greil Marcus have assembled an astonishing group of writers and artists—Paul Muldoon, Stanley Crouch, R. Crumb, Jon Langford of the Mekons, John Rockwell, Luc Sante, Joyce Carol Oates, Dave Marsh, and more than a dozen other novelists, essayists, performers, and critics—to explore the ineffable power of the American ballad. In words and in drawings, the collaborators have tapped the veins of America's most imaginative and expressive form. From "Barbara Allen," one of the earliest, through "The Wreck of the Old 97," to contemporary ballads by Bob Dylan and Bruce Springsteen, The Rose & the Briar presents a rich new patch of art and commentary—like the ballads, no two the same, but all of a piece, about stories, storytellers, and American death, love, and liberty.
philipchevron wrote:Clash Cadillac wrote:The Rose & The Briar - Sean Wilentz and Greil Marcus (2005)
Great book. I think I'm right in saying there's a CD that goes with it too.
|
Board index » General » Speaker's Corner All times are UTC |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest