[/quote]



Low D wrote:For some reason, we went an saw The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies.
I would agree with most of what every one has said about this film. In addition to all the previously mentioned sins committed by Jackson on this sprawling mess, though, i think two deserve to be highlighted:
1. Why the heck did he split the two films in the middle of Smaug's attack on Laketown? We jump into this movie in the middle of action, having forgot why Bard is in jail, that he has a family, why some dwarf is with them, what is up with the mayor, etc etc. So dumb. It wasn't a commercial break in the middle of a show, it was a year off in between.
2. Crowded with tertiary characters from the book (like Bard and the mayor) from the book who have been expanded, and with a host of new characters invented (like Tauriel the elf, the mayor's master of coin) the character of Bilbo kind of disappears (and not just when he puts his ring on) and becomes a secondary character. Wasn't The Hobbit about Bilbo? I thought it was.
Best review I've read of this film:
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies: At Least It's Over Now
Not only does Peter Jackson's trilogy fail on its own terms, it retrospectively diminishes the Lord of the Rings' success.
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainmen ... ow/383876/
Doktor Avalanche wrote:Went yesterday with 9 12-year-olds for my youngest's birthday.

|
Board index » General » Speaker's Corner All times are UTC |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests