meowhouse wrote:Thank you, that is especially appreciated coming from you, Mr. D3 (is that what you're up to now??) For that, and all your Pogues shoots,
I am filled with jealousy! I keep trying to think of ways to justify the cost of one, but so far I haven't made a good case to myself.
I haven't yet either. I'm still toting around the D1X. I am filled with the suck.
I don't know if you read the enormous book I wrote in there but they only let us stay in the pit for maybe one-and-a-half songs so I didn't even get shots of everyone, thinking I had more time left. And we were all stuffed onto stage right. I had gotten a bunch of pictures of Tim Brennan playing the guitar also (besides the accordion) but I couldn't get far enough over and the mic is in the way for all of them. Sadness.
Huh. That's a particularly restrictive photo policy.
I can understand that bands don't want the distraction of photographers constantly in the way, and that the punters paid the ticket price and deserve a show without tall people (well, tall in my case) with cameras standing in front of them the whole night, etc. But restricted to 1.5 songs, and restricted to one side of the stage? That sucks.
The most restrictive I've had to deal with is the Wiltern, in L.A. They require that photographers be on a ramp about 20 feet back from the stage. The ramp runs roughly center-stage to stage-right. After the requisite number of songs the photographers are ushered out of the hall where they must either check their cameras or leave the premises. But even there they at least honored the band's guidelines for songs (for The Pogues it's usually songs 2-4, though sometimes 1-3, and more rarely 1-4).
I wonder if this craptacular photo policy you ran into was an artifact of the venue or of the band?
“I know all those people that were in the film [...] But that’s when they were young and strong and full of life, you know?”