Page 2 of 8
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:16 amby soulfinger
Davey Green wrote:Its like this Mr Chevron The Pogues started without you and The Pogues can continue without you as proved by the last 2 Xmas tours.Your nothing mate Shane is just your meal ticket end of story stick to hanging around on internet forums to try and convince yourself that you are important.Merry Xmas
Thanks for sharing your insight. Do be a good chap and bugger off back to iwantanargument.com
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:22 amby Clash Cadillac
soulfinger wrote:Davey Green wrote:Its like this Mr Chevron The Pogues started without you and The Pogues can continue without you as proved by the last 2 Xmas tours.Your nothing mate Shane is just your meal ticket end of story stick to hanging around on internet forums to try and convince yourself that you are important.Merry Xmas
Thanks for sharing your insight. Do be a good chap and bugger off back to iwantanargument.com
I'll second that motion.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:25 amby Clash Cadillac
TOSCS wrote:Funnily enough, this thread inspired me to go and give Waiting For Herb a proper listen, and I've found some great new songs. I always like Haunted, but Paris St Germain and Drunken Boat are pretty sweet too.
Yes I was just speaking with my brother at a cocktail party yesterday about the very same. He first saw the Pogues without Shane and they instantly became his favorite band. Still are.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:10 amby Jon
Davey Green wrote: But if Shane was missing it wouldnt be as good.Just wondering what everyone elses thoughts are
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:09 amby Corey MacLennane
From Wikipedia:
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet%5Ftroll
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:46 pmby SkaPunkAndOtherJunk
I would hope this douchebag's IP address was banned by now.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:56 pmby chatterbox
First of all, this is quite obviously a HUGE wind up.
Secondly, I would far prefer a pogues gig without Shane. Especially if they performed some of shanes tracks with some combination of Spider/Terry/Mr. C on vocals. I saw that video of Greenland in England somewhere, and although it was quite funny, it was also quite embarrasing for the rest of the band. I really think the rest of the band are on top form at the moment but Shane just drags them down.
Also, I think I'm getting a bit bored of hearing the same songs over and over again. I really enjoyed Cotton fields, greenland and Metropolis this year and actually physicaly wet myself after Dark streets and Transmetropolitan last year. I have recently begun to wonder, what would happen if they replaced Shane. I realise I may or may not be treading on an awful lot of toes with that suggestion but nevertheless, its an interesting prospect.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:52 pmby Guest
I have heard from a very official source that it was recently considered that The Pogues tour with Patsy Watchorn instead of Shane as he was refusing to tour and had other commitments. However, this never came to be.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:01 pmby moose
chatterbox wrote: and actually physicaly wet myself after Dark streets and Transmetropolitan last year.
Far, far, too much information, or too much alcohol
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:02 pmby moose
Guest wrote:I have heard from a very official source that it was recently considered that The Pogues tour with Patsy Watchorn instead of Shane as he was refusing to tour and had other commitments. However, this never came to be.
Name them and bugger the consequences!
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:34 pmby Noel Kenny
Guest wrote:I have heard from a very official source that it was recently considered that The Pogues tour with Patsy Watchorn instead of Shane as he was refusing to tour and had other commitments. However, this never came to be.
That's a load of shite.. It was Ronan Keating , not Patsy Watchorn
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Wed Dec 24, 2008 4:06 pmby Jon
Noel Kenny wrote:Guest wrote:I have heard from a very official source that it was recently considered that The Pogues tour with Patsy Watchorn instead of Shane as he was refusing to tour and had other commitments. However, this never came to be.
That's a load of shite.. It was Ronan Keating , not Patsy Watchorn
I have it on good merit that Prof Stephen Hawking will be free for gigs once he's retired as the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge next year.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:54 amby wwfcpogue
i loved all the pogues stuff without shane.tuesday morning is a bloody classic .free speech is one thing ,downright abuse of our band is another
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:34 pmby philipchevron
wwfcpogue wrote:i loved all the pogues stuff without shane.tuesday morning is a bloody classic .free speech is one thing ,downright abuse of our band is another
They too who resent, dislike or are merely irked by us may also post.
Re: The Pogues without Shane
Posted:
Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:04 pmby smack389
The Pogues (excuse the band for a mo) are Shane!!!
Now amongst with many others of you I have watched the Pogues with spider at the helm and ok they were good but isnt half the reason we go to see Shane????
Ok its good to see honours passed over to Phil, Spider, Andrew, Terry etc for a few songs (nice change) but come on Shane is the man who should steer the Sodomy along its path in life, whoever thinks not should start listening to The Fureys or someone!!!