Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:29 pmCan we go there then?
Nice one guys
Nice one guys
Page 8 of 8
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:29 pmPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:55 pmMEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:07 pmAnonymous wrote:MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.
Not all reviews make the overnight editions.
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:24 pmphilipchevron wrote:Anonymous wrote:MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.
Not all reviews make the overnight editions.
I thought this issue was dead and buried. Unfortunatley it takes some longer to gauge an opinion. And it was stupid to leave after four numbers, you are to blame for the waste. It was not the greatest show, but was still enjoyable, leave after four numbers, what a 'FUC****' stupid thing to do.
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:49 pmOk it wasnt the best show of the tour, but to suggest you left after only 4 songs is probably an over exaggeration of what you actually did!
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:09 pmKeithWillis wrote:Ok it wasnt the best show of the tour, but to suggest you left after only 4 songs is probably an over exaggeration of what you actually did!
maybe he did? 60 quid, he musta been watching christina aguilera. no wonder he thought it was shit
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:11 pmAnonymous wrote:MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.
Every band has the odd gig where it doesn't go right. Ones of Shanes best mates had just died, which might have put him off somewhat.
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:53 amModerator - Is it possible to lock this thread so it fades into the forum? I do not see the point in debating one show that was below the normal superb standard over three months after it took place.
Regards,
Jim (who only wrote this after checking it will be back to the position it is now very shortly due to postings about the new US shows)
Regards,
Jim (who only wrote this after checking it will be back to the position it is now very shortly due to postings about the new US shows)
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:05 amThank, Jim, for you notice but:
On my behalf I can add - better they let off steam here than lay an ambush with baseball bat somewhere in the dark alley
DzM wrote:These fora are not here to provide only positive feedback about the band and its members - the fora are here for fans to have open and honest conversations. Sometimes those conversations will be critical of the people we admire, but freedom means being able to say unpopular things.
On my behalf I can add - better they let off steam here than lay an ambush with baseball bat somewhere in the dark alley
Re: Manchester Underperformance !
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:27 pmLooking back it really was p*** poor! "007 was much better though, so keep the head of steam going in 2008! (and maybe this thread as well)