If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?
Chris C wrote:If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?
To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.
Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.
I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.
The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.
Ignatius Giddy wrote:It is odd how some people can belittle such a unique and majesterial group of musicians such as The Pogues. It is NOT Shane and The Pogues, it is The Pogues including Shane, an indivisible unit. It is true that most fans want to see the entire unit live and to hear it on record, especially those who have been around since the early days. It just seems sad that sometimes Shane behaves as if he doesn't want to be there.
|
Board index » The Pogues » Live shows All times are UTC |
Users browsing this forum: Doktor Avalanche and 5 guests