The Pogues without Shane

[wwfcpogue]

hiya soul mate ,how ya doin long time no see .yes im still here mate

[irish hillbilly]

Pogue Mahone was one of my first Pogues recordings and still my favorite, I don't care what anyone says. The music and vocals just flowed like a great recording should.

[yer man at the end of the bar]

I think this thread answers the question of "The Pogues without Shane":
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10421

[keithwillis2uk]

Unbelievable some of the posts here. The Pogues are a collection of exceptional musicians who all contribute to the band in their own ways. As a pure songwriter Shane can not be beaten, and i have followed this band since around 1985 and been to 100's of their shows. These days i could not imagine going to a show and not hearing the likes of '1000's are sailing', 'Repeal of the licensing laws' or 'Tuesday Morning'. At the moment i cannot think of any other band who can produce performances like The Pogues. I just can't?

[Chris C]

If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?

To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.

Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.

I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.

The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.

[philipchevron]

If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?

To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.

Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.

I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.

The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.

And with Chris's post, the defence rests.

[mekongwhiskey]

I can't say I wouldn't be extremely disappointed if Shane would have been a no-show at our concert at Club Nokia in L.A. last month, but when he disappeared after encore #1 and Spidey took over, he and the band did their usual smash up, trouser tearing, rousing renditions that could have woken the dead. With Philip, Spider and Andrew as alternate helmsmen, I'd say they have quite a lethal vocal crew. So, would I have payed 80 bucks to experience a Shaneless Pogues? Absolutely.