The Medusa Fora

Eric V wrote:

philipchevron wrote:

Eric V wrote:

territa wrote: But the version that WILL appear, I think that would be banned here. Go figure.

Oh, get out. Its just a cd cover. Do they ban them? Like Sniff the Glove?

Of COURSE they ban them. Here's how it's done "No thank you, we have plenty of copies of that left to sell already".

Isn't it about the music though? I can respect the artwork (though I honestly don't like it for reasons that have more to do with my opinion of the actual situation at Abu Grab at the time of the pics than my opinion of the war in general. In short, except for the pure pop media propaganda effect, it has no legs....people will associate it with a private who was kicked out of the Army carrying the baby of a dirtbag-of-a-Sergeant, and their dirty mischief) on its own right, even linked to the music/band, as you obviously must, but in the end, for you, was it not about getting the music out for people to hear -- or was it the whole "scene? (i.e., the combination of the music, the attitude, the dress, the style, the controversy, etc...)"
...and I'll have you know I had to go back and correct every single the from the teh I typed. I must be semi-dyslexic or weak-fingered, or somethin'.

Eric V wrote:though I honestly don't like it for reasons that have more to do with my opinion of the actual situation at Abu Grab at the time of the pics than my opinion of the war in general

Clash Cadillac wrote:I have a sister-in-law who works for the feds and did her training at Quantico. She is totally brainwashed into believing that us "civilians" are totally clueless about the inner workings of our governement and she is somehow more enlightened then the general populous.

DzM wrote:

Clash Cadillac wrote:I have a sister-in-law who works for the feds and did her training at Quantico. She is totally brainwashed into believing that us "civilians" are totally clueless about the inner workings of our governement and she is somehow more enlightened then the general populous.

What a fantastic attitude for an employee of a government that is, ostensibly, "Of the people, by the people, for the people."

If she firmly believes that the government is that opaque is she doing anything to open it up to public scrutiny and understanding?

Clash Cadillac wrote:

DzM wrote:What a fantastic attitude for an employee of a government that is, ostensibly, "Of the people, by the people, for the people."

If she firmly believes that the government is that opaque is she doing anything to open it up to public scrutiny and understanding?

If that happened she may no longer feel superior to us lowly civillians.

Clash Cadillac wrote: us lowly civillians.

Clash Cadillac wrote:
I have a sister-in-law who works for the feds and did her training at Quantico. She is totally brainwashed into believing that us "civilians" are totally clueless about the inner workings of our governement and she is somehow more enlightened then the general populous.

Eric V wrote:

Clash Cadillac wrote: us lowly civillians.

Once again, I am sorry you feel inferior. Maybe your sister knows what she's talking about? I don't know. Maybe not. But you obviously let it get to you. Next time you get together at the family get together try offering up informed arguments to counter her brainwashed rhetoric. If that doesn't work, try slapping her and yelling "DEVIL GIRL! DEVIL GIRL!" over and over again. If nothing else it might help make you feel less inferior. If all else fails, join the "Feds" and change it from the inside.

Eric V wrote:Clash C -- Your sister.... is she FBI? also....is she hot? ....does she carry a gun?

Clash Cadillac wrote:, not FBI,

Eric V wrote:

Clash Cadillac wrote:, not FBI,

Secret Service?