Medusans answer this:
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:54 pmWould Shane lose that certain "something" that he has if he were to quit the drink and the ciggs!?
Indisputably.
ps you have a very alluring right thigh, btw.
Page 1 of 3
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:54 pmPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:15 pmPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:19 pmHuh?
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:24 pmRe: Medusans answer this:
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:27 pmMissWalshy wrote:Would Shane lose that certain "something" that he has if he were to quit the drink and the ciggs!?
Of course he would.................bit of a silly question really
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:28 pmShut up
twas you that said different!
twas you that said different!
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:29 pmKilmichael wrote:http://www.myspace.com/misswalshy
Unless it's an imposters leg?!
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:29 pmI'd say no. I'm pretty sure he can still write beautiful songs without drinking or smoking, and he'd probably be able to do it for a lot longer.
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:30 pmBud Byrne wrote:MissWalshy wrote:Would Shane lose that certain "something" that he has if he were to quit the drink and the ciggs!?
Of course he would.................bit of a silly question really
Nah. it's a great question!
I gonna make meself comfortable and finally learn what true fans value Shane for...
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:32 pmMissWalshy wrote:
Huh?!
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:33 pmYou've killed it now Maccers !
People will only reply with no now.. so they don't feel so shallow!
People will only reply with no now.. so they don't feel so shallow!
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:33 pmKilmichael wrote:MissWalshy wrote:
Huh?!
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:34 pmMissWalshy wrote:Shut up
twas you that said different!
I know but I bet that annoyed you though.
I actually don't think he would lose anything. He would still be Shane. The music would still be THE music.
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:35 pmMissWalshy wrote:You've killed it now Maccers !
People will only reply with no now.. so they don't feel so shallow!
Bud Byrne wrote:I actually don't think he would lose anything. He would still be Shane. The music would still be THE music.
Aha, it works, you see
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:36 pmMissWalshy wrote:You've killed it now Maccers !
People will only reply with no now.. so they don't feel so shallow!
Don't under estimate your fellow Medusans Walshy. Everyone will give their own opinion whether it is what othres want to hear or not.
So............what do you think?