Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ General ‹ Speaker's Corner ‹ Sport
  • Syndication
  • Change font size
  • FAQ
  • Members
  • Register
  • Login

The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post a reply

Question Which do you wear on your feet: shoes, gloves, scarf:
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   
  • Options

Expand view Topic review: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

  • Quote soulfinger

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by soulfinger Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:10 pm

firehazard wrote:Whatever you think about the current England set-up, test cricket has got fun again.

Stokes looking like a very good captain at the moment.


The best it's been for a very long time. Five days of crash, bang, wallop cricket. Terrific fun to watch.!
[quote="firehazard"]Whatever you think about the current England set-up, test cricket has got fun again.

Stokes looking like a very good captain at the moment.[/quote]

The best it's been for a very long time. Five days of crash, bang, wallop cricket. Terrific fun to watch.!
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Tue Dec 06, 2022 9:41 am

Whatever you think about the current England set-up, test cricket has got fun again.

Stokes looking like a very good captain at the moment.
Whatever you think about the current England set-up, test cricket has got fun again.

Stokes looking like a very good captain at the moment.
  • Quote Welshie

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by Welshie Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:35 pm

Hey speaking of ice skates, i was watching Glamorgan play on you tube livestream back in April against Yorkshire....it was snow stop play!! (Seriously!)
Hey speaking of ice skates, i was watching Glamorgan play on you tube livestream back in April against Yorkshire....it was snow stop play!! (Seriously!)
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:58 am

I stand corrected. It seems the E&WCB have decided we're going back to a two-division CC next season With a 10/8 split of the counties, which is a tad weird.

So the E&WCB appear (for once) to have seen sense. Meanwhile the devil has been seen buying ice skates.

But it basically looks like good news.
I stand corrected. It seems the E&WCB have decided we're going back to a two-division CC next season With a 10/8 split of the counties, which is a tad weird.

So the E&WCB appear (for once) to have seen sense. Meanwhile the devil has been seen buying ice skates.

But it basically looks like good news.
  • Quote Welshie

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by Welshie Wed Oct 13, 2021 1:02 pm

Oh dear FH, not good news!
Oh dear FH, not good news!
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:35 pm

Welshie wrote:Essex got a trophy as well FH, i know its not the one you wanted but better than nothing! You are correct regarding season ending blues, Glamorgan seem to be just going through the motions! Although over 1000 runs scored in the Surrey v Glam game!


There was a lot of confusion on the Essex forum about whether or not there was an actual trophy for winning the 2nd tier. There used to be a trophy for winning Division 2, but now with this this weird 3 conference system no one seemed to know. Then the trophy wasn't in the right place to be presented at the right time anyway... Suppose it was a factor that the last match of the season at Chelmsford was over before lunch on the 2nd day. Northants were not good. Don't think Essex expected to win by an innings after being all out for 170. It felt more like one of the old 3-day CC matches I used to go and watch back in the 70s.

Looks like we'll be stuck with this stupid 3 conference thing next season too.
[quote="Welshie"]Essex got a trophy as well FH, i know its not the one you wanted but better than nothing! You are correct regarding season ending blues, Glamorgan seem to be just going through the motions! Although over 1000 runs scored in the Surrey v Glam game![/quote]

There was a lot of confusion on the Essex forum about whether or not there was an actual trophy for winning the 2nd tier. There used to be a trophy for winning Division 2, but now with this this weird 3 conference system no one seemed to know. Then the trophy wasn't in the right place to be presented at the right time anyway... Suppose it was a factor that the last match of the season at Chelmsford was over before lunch on the 2nd day. Northants were not good. Don't think Essex expected to win by an innings after being all out for 170. It felt more like one of the old 3-day CC matches I used to go and watch back in the 70s.

Looks like we'll be stuck with this stupid 3 conference thing next season too.
  • Quote Welshie

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by Welshie Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:56 am

Essex got a trophy as well FH, i know its not the one you wanted but better than nothing! You are correct regarding season ending blues, Glamorgan seem to be just going through the motions! Although over 1000 runs scored in the Surrey v Glam game!
Essex got a trophy as well FH, i know its not the one you wanted but better than nothing! You are correct regarding season ending blues, Glamorgan seem to be just going through the motions! Although over 1000 runs scored in the Surrey v Glam game!
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:46 am

Welshie wrote:Good win for Essex yesterday FH, so well done them.
Still i'm quite pleased that Glamorgan have ended this season with some silverware for the first time since 2004.


Essex have had a very poor season by recent standards. Typically it looks like they may be coming good for the end of the season, but it's too late to make a difference this time. Watching the county stuff, it seems like many counties already have that end-of-season-don't-care attitude.

Good to see Glammy get a trophy.

And the test series is interesting now.
[quote="Welshie"]Good win for Essex yesterday FH, so well done them.
Still i'm quite pleased that Glamorgan have ended this season with some silverware for the first time since 2004.
[/quote]

Essex have had a very poor season by recent standards. Typically it looks like they may be coming good for the end of the season, but it's too late to make a difference this time. Watching the county stuff, it seems like many counties already have that end-of-season-don't-care attitude.

Good to see Glammy get a trophy.

And the test series is interesting now.
  • Quote Welshie

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by Welshie Thu Sep 02, 2021 9:15 am

Good win for Essex yesterday FH, so well done them.
Still i'm quite pleased that Glamorgan have ended this season with some silverware for the first time since 2004.
Cheers
Aled
Good win for Essex yesterday FH, so well done them.
Still i'm quite pleased that Glamorgan have ended this season with some silverware for the first time since 2004.
Cheers
Aled
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:53 am

soulfinger wrote:Meanwhile: “Even when key players are playing we think we can beat anyone in the world – we don’t wait for the opposition to be weak,” Kohli's wise words before India were bowled out for 78!


Scrub some of my comments above. England are obviously brilliant at test cricket.

Though it helps when you get to bowl first at Headingley.
[quote="soulfinger"]Meanwhile: “Even when key players are playing we think we can beat anyone in the world – we don’t wait for the opposition to be weak,” Kohli's wise words before India were bowled out for 78![/quote]

Scrub some of my comments above. England are obviously brilliant at test cricket.

Though it helps when you get to bowl first at Headingley.
  • Quote soulfinger

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by soulfinger Wed Aug 25, 2021 3:24 pm

Meanwhile: “Even when key players are playing we think we can beat anyone in the world – we don’t wait for the opposition to be weak,” Kohli's wise words before India were bowled out for 78!
Meanwhile: “Even when key players are playing we think we can beat anyone in the world – we don’t wait for the opposition to be weak,” Kohli's wise words before India were bowled out for 78!
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Tue Aug 24, 2021 8:01 am

soulfinger wrote:I think County cricket has been written off so many times, it's hilarious. The crowds for county games are pitiful for the clubs in financial terms. Mostly older folk who are members (so get minimum price admission), bring their own food and drink and don't buy anything in the club shop. Bloody communists!

I'm no longer a member but may rejoin when I'm 65! As a kid, I knew a gateman at OT, so never paid to get in until I was 16, when I bought a junior membership. It's a pity, in the digital ticket age, that such advantageous terms are no longer available...


True. Essex have always tended to get comparatively good crowds and a large membership for what to be honest is a smaller county club. Though they used to get a lot more back in the days when they took the show on the road round the county and played at least half their matches on outgrounds. Those were the days. I started off being taken by the old man and the old lady back in the early 70s in the days of the 40-over Sunday league, to places like Ilford, Southend, Leyton, Harlow... and once I'd got my junior membership (annual birthday present) I spent much of the time when I wasn't at school (cough) following them round the county. I always intended, once I could afford it, to buy myself a life membership, but it always seemed to be just out of my reach. And one of the first of my lifetime's ambitions was to be "one of the old blokes who sit and watch the cricket". I gave up my membership, finally, when they stopped playing at Colchester, the last of those outgrounds, and focused everything on Chelmsford, which is an absolutely pit of a cricket ground that should've been demolished or properly redeveloped years ago.

But in the current climate, and especially if ECB resources are being pumped into promoting city-based franchises, it's hard to see the non-test-ground counties surviving in their present form.
[quote="soulfinger"]I think County cricket has been written off so many times, it's hilarious. The crowds for county games are pitiful for the clubs in financial terms. Mostly older folk who are members (so get minimum price admission), bring their own food and drink and don't buy anything in the club shop. Bloody communists!

I'm no longer a member but may rejoin when I'm 65! As a kid, I knew a gateman at OT, so never paid to get in until I was 16, when I bought a junior membership. It's a pity, in the digital ticket age, that such advantageous terms are no longer available...[/quote]

True. Essex have always tended to get comparatively good crowds and a large membership for what to be honest is a smaller county club. Though they used to get a lot more back in the days when they took the show on the road round the county and played at least half their matches on outgrounds. Those were the days. I started off being taken by the old man and the old lady back in the early 70s in the days of the 40-over Sunday league, to places like Ilford, Southend, Leyton, Harlow... and once I'd got my junior membership (annual birthday present) I spent much of the time when I wasn't at school (cough) following them round the county. I always intended, once I could afford it, to buy myself a life membership, but it always seemed to be just out of my reach. And one of the first of my lifetime's ambitions was to be "one of the old blokes who sit and watch the cricket". I gave up my membership, finally, when they stopped playing at Colchester, the last of those outgrounds, and focused everything on Chelmsford, which is an absolutely pit of a cricket ground that should've been demolished or properly redeveloped years ago.

But in the current climate, and especially if ECB resources are being pumped into promoting city-based franchises, it's hard to see the non-test-ground counties surviving in their present form.
  • Quote soulfinger

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by soulfinger Sun Aug 22, 2021 4:47 pm

I think County cricket has been written off so many times, it's hilarious. The crowds for county games are pitiful for the clubs in financial terms. Mostly older folk who are members (so get minimum price admission), bring their own food and drink and don't buy anything in the club shop. Bloody communists!

I'm no longer a member but may rejoin when I'm 65! As a kid, I knew a gateman at OT, so never paid to get in until I was 16, when I bought a junior membership. It's a pity, in the digital ticket age, that such advantageous terms are no longer available...
I think County cricket has been written off so many times, it's hilarious. The crowds for county games are pitiful for the clubs in financial terms. Mostly older folk who are members (so get minimum price admission), bring their own food and drink and don't buy anything in the club shop. Bloody communists!

I'm no longer a member but may rejoin when I'm 65! As a kid, I knew a gateman at OT, so never paid to get in until I was 16, when I bought a junior membership. It's a pity, in the digital ticket age, that such advantageous terms are no longer available...
  • Quote firehazard

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by firehazard Sun Aug 22, 2021 8:25 am

soulfinger wrote:I'm glad your mum likes it! My old fella, who is of a similar vintage, declared it utterly unwatchable.
However I did catch my daughter watching it. She gave me some lecture about viewers having migrated to other platforms so there needed to be something non-traditional brought to free to air in order to attract the yoof. I thought that was just more balls...


The old lady is a lifelong cricket fan, and basically it's about the only form of the game she can get to watch now, as she doesn't do/understand the concept of paying to watch TV, so that sort of explains it. The ECB and the BBC have given it so much hype that it may be drawing in a fair few. And the number of freebie tickets for the games that have been given out means the crowds look good, apparently. I haven't watched more than about 2 minutes of it myself.

Suspicion is that the 16.4 is part of a cunning plan to kill off county cricket as a professional sport, certainly apart from the counties with test-status grounds. Though where they then think England are going to get their test team from is a mystery.
[quote="soulfinger"]
I'm glad your mum likes it! My old fella, who is of a similar vintage, declared it utterly unwatchable.
However I did catch my daughter watching it. She gave me some lecture about viewers having migrated to other platforms so there needed to be something non-traditional brought to free to air in order to attract the yoof. I thought that was just more balls...[/quote]

The old lady is a lifelong cricket fan, and basically it's about the only form of the game she can get to watch now, as she doesn't do/understand the concept of paying to watch TV, so that sort of explains it. The ECB and the BBC have given it so much hype that it may be drawing in a fair few. And the number of freebie tickets for the games that have been given out means the crowds look good, apparently. I haven't watched more than about 2 minutes of it myself.

Suspicion is that the 16.4 is part of a cunning plan to kill off county cricket as a professional sport, certainly apart from the counties with test-status grounds. Though where they then think England are going to get their test team from is a mystery.
  • Quote soulfinger

Re: The cricket thread (incorporating the Ashes)

Post by soulfinger Sat Aug 21, 2021 12:57 pm

firehazard wrote: Unexpectedly, my 90-something-year-old mother is really enjoying it. But that's mostly, I think, about having cricket available on free-to-air TV. Still I don't think she was their target audience.


I'm glad your mum likes it! My old fella, who is of a similar vintage, declared it utterly unwatchable.
However I did catch my daughter watching it. She gave me some lecture about viewers having migrated to other platforms so there needed to be something non-traditional brought to free to air in order to attract the yoof. I thought that was just more balls...
[quote="firehazard"] Unexpectedly, my 90-something-year-old mother is really enjoying it. But that's mostly, I think, about having cricket available on free-to-air TV. Still I don't think she was their target audience.[/quote]

I'm glad your mum likes it! My old fella, who is of a similar vintage, declared it utterly unwatchable.
However I did catch my daughter watching it. She gave me some lecture about viewers having migrated to other platforms so there needed to be something non-traditional brought to free to air in order to attract the yoof. I thought that was just more balls...

Top

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB
Content © copyright the original authors unless otherwise indicated