Ooops. Just saw this waiting in the queue. Should have approved it three weeks ago. My bad, Leadshoes.

[quote="Low D"][quote="DzM"]
Meh. “Good” and “crap” are pretty subjective when it comes to art. [/quote]

See, NORMALLY I would agree...[/quote]

No wonder hardly anyone new joins this forum and sticks around. But then I can't say I know how I lasted so long in all the smug clique-ishness here. Probably because it was easy to stay away for long periods and ignore posters when they weren't getting on my case for having unpopular opinions.

As your favorite conspiracy theorist David Icke has said:

“We laugh at sheep because sheep just follow the one in front. But humans have out-sheeped the sheep, because at least the sheep need a sheep dog to keep them in line. Humans keep each other in line. And they do it by ridiculing or condemning anyone who commits the crime, and that’s what it’s become, of being different.”

Anyway, God is finally cleaning house soon because he and the rest of the greater universe are disgusted with what's gone on in this world. He was almost going to just get rid of all humanity as a failed experiment, but because of the naively over-compassionate higher being who's called Jesus by some, humans had a chance to redeem themselves (it's a lie that Jesus died for everyone's sins), but humans as a whole have failed miserably and only the very best humans (regardless of their beliefs) will make it through to the new good sane world when this one's done with. Humans arrogantly think they're the smartest creatures on earth, but they've allowed the earth to be destroyed beyond repair and they've managed to become the only ones who have to earn and pay money just to live. And most people don't realize that life on earth once was virtually a paradise before the devil and his minions came along and installed their predatory system. We've been lied to about nearly everything. What we'd now consider magic was once the norm, and all of those incredibly elaborate religious and government buildings are actually repurposed buildings (that used free atmospheric energy) from that former time of advanced technology and ethics, so we've regressed beyond belief as a species. That evidence is right in front of us, but somehow we're supposed to believe that everything's better now than it ever has been.

To get a good idea of why and how it all ends, you can revisit the words to the Last Poets' [b][i]Mean Machine[/i][/b]...
----------------------
Automatic push-button remote control
Synthetic genetics command your soul
Automatic push-button remote control
Synthetic genetics command your soul

Driving me nuts, bolts, screws
I got the blues from paying dues
For programmed news of honeycoated lies
Your eyes can't believe
That weave the Devil's magic with the latest gadget
From the Mean Machine
A'running the Same Game with Another Name
Down in your brain, blowing your mind
Stealing your time, smooth and slick
With the latest trick to get rich quick
From nonsense at your mind's expense
As your mind digs the scene
From the Mean Machine
Designed to drive your brain insane
Loudspeakers blasting inside your head
Saying what someone else said
For you to do what they want you to
No. Go. Fast. Slow.
Getting you high off the latest lie
Telling you when, where, how and why
As your mind digs the scene
From the Mean Machine,
A'running the Same Game with Another Name
Factories of insanity playing on your vanity
As they distort your sense of self
Telling you what you need and how to succeed
As they steal all of your wealth
Probing your mind, trying to find
How to scheme on you best
From programmed schools with Devilish rules
Putting you to the test
Death dealing devices sold at high prices
Designed with you in mind to buy
As they kill you slow and some of y'all don't even know
Y'all paying the Machine to die
Mechanized lies dressed up in disguise
In forms of various kinds
Treachery and deceit the people must defeat
In the battle for free men's minds
For complete domination is the goal of this nation
Of all free thinking thought
And those who oppose will be killed by their foes
The flunkies whose souls have been bought
Transplants to revive the living dead
Replacing the truth with lies instead
Newspapers, radios, TVs
Spreading lies across the seven seas
Robot men with computers for brains
Space ships, cars, trains and planes
All calculated to blow your mind
Moving faster than your sense of time
Living luxuriously soft while the people slave hard
For the Devil would have you believe he is God
Chemical drugs that keep you high
While the Mean Machine creates another lie
For power and glory and world wide fame
While Running the Same Game with Another Name
It's the computer's equation for world wide invasion
That comes in the name of peace and goodwill
But all of them are lying as they keep on trying
To set the people up for the kill
Population control of the people with soul
All over the planet Earth.
Manipulating their will with a tiny white pill
To control their natural birth
Behind the scene schemes furthering the Mean Machine's
Dreams
Of conquest and world domination
From the farthest depths of the universe
To the smallest earthly nation
Radar, Sonar, Laser beams!
Jets, Tanks, Submarines!
Megathons, H-Bombs, Napalm, Gas!
All this shit will kill you fast
All products of the Mean Machine
The Devil disguised as a human being
And he will even preach that God is dead
And some of y'all will believe what the Devil has said
And he will then act as the world's police
And the sun will rise up in the West
And set down in the East
And when it came time to the end...
And when it came time to the end...
And when it came time to the end...
The men will look like the women
And the women like the men
And some will dance in a hypnotic trance
Like as if they have no care
But these will be signs of the changing times
That the end is drawing near
For it was prophesized many centuries past
That the end will come in a fiery holocaust
And only the righteous people will survive the blast
And the Devil's machine will bring about its own end
And peace, love and joy will reign once again
And man will understand man
And man will understand man
And man will understand man
And man will understand man
And man will understand man
And man will understand
And live in harmony and peace
And the sun will once again
Rise up in the East

[quote="DzM"]
Meh. “Good” and “crap” are pretty subjective when it comes to art. [/quote]

See, NORMALLY I would agree...

[quote="Low D"]The problem you're missing is that these album covers you keep posting are objectively crap. All your weird personality conflicts or whatever are kind of beside the point. It's just science (or stience, I think).[/quote]
Meh. “Good” and “crap” are pretty subjective when it comes to art. There are also some design trends that have really not aged well (at least in my opinion). Hence the question I asked - “why, in your view, did this cover nail it? Why is it good?” (Yes, I’ve paraphrased myself. I’m too lazy to scroll up to see what I actually wrote)

The problem you're missing is that these album covers you keep posting are objectively crap. All your weird personality conflicts or whatever are kind of beside the point. It's just science (or stience, I think).

[quote="Frances"][quote="leadshoes"][quote="Low D"]Yah it's sort of a good example of what NOT to do, esp the separate photos with different lighting, different perspectives/sizes, different angles.[/quote]

I know you're just here for the mobbing opportunity, but whatever. [/quote]



If you can dish it out you best learn to take it.

Maybe everyone was being extremely polite and not prickly until you decided to call a certain person an asshole, ya’ think?


The phrase “mobbing opportunity” rings of a persecution complex. But I’m a moron, so what would I know ‘bout that. :lol:[/quote]

All this happened before I called anyone an asshole. And you should've taken your own advice ("If you can dish it out you best learn to take it.") when I called you out on your obnoxious ODB diagnosis. And yes, you're a moron and quite a lot more than that, but it doesn't mean you don't know the stupid shit that's going on.

[quote="DzM"][quote="leadshoes"][quote="DzM"][quote="leadshoes"]
So what makes this "good" and/or "classic" for you is that it's somewhat a tribute to an actor that died earlier this year, but not the cover itself. OK.[/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote]
No. Hearing about Honor Blackman's death reminded me that Cherry Red reissued the single in what I thought was a "good if not classic" cover. And anyway, I think old records in the Goodwill's 50 cent bin are more likely to have good or classic covers than more expensive records, so that's where I'm coming from.

[quote="leadshoes"][quote="Low D"]Yah it's sort of a good example of what NOT to do, esp the separate photos with different lighting, different perspectives/sizes, different angles.[/quote]

I know you're just here for the mobbing opportunity, but whatever. [/quote]



If you can dish it out you best learn to take it.

Maybe everyone was being extremely polite and not prickly until you decided to call a certain person an asshole, ya’ think?


The phrase “mobbing opportunity” rings of a persecution complex. But I’m a moron, so what would I know ‘bout that. :lol:

[quote="leadshoes"][quote="DzM"][quote="leadshoes"][img]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50329758131_0eae509ea0.jpg[/img][/quote]
So I'm genuinely curious about your selection criteria (and this could be said for nearly all of the covers you share):

What about this cover has made you say "Yes. YES! THIS one is Good, or Classic, of Good & Classic!"?

I know nothing of the artist featured so have no personal attachment to it. Instead I'm judging it based purely on what's presented. It appears to be two unrelated over-contrasted publicity shots placed on paste-up board and some Letraset rub-on font in title-caps. For all intents and purposes this album cover, from a design and photography point of view, is nearly indistinguishable from dozens of other ~1960s era albums I've seen in the 50¢ bins at Goodwill. So what am I missing? Is there something about this genre or this cover in particular, that I'm overlooking? Please educate me.[/quote]

I've already basically answered this question from you before, so I really don't need to again, but what it boils down to is "different strokes for different folks." And I reckon a good single sleeve is as good of a record cover as an album cover. Anyway, after finding out that Diana Rigg had just passed away, I learned that Honor Blackman, who played John Steed/Patrick MacNee's previous cohort on the Avengers also died this year, and I remembered this reissue cover was a nice homage to the Avengers TV show and classic spare 60's graphics. It was a toss between this and the 12" version, which wouldn't be to your taste, either...[/quote]
So what makes this "good" and/or "classic" for you is that it's somewhat a tribute to an actor that died earlier this year, but not the cover itself. OK.

[quote="firehazard"]Whatever one thinks of the quality of it, it's the cover of a single rather than an album anyway. But the big question is why Mr MacNee is apparently dressed as a vicar.[/quote]

I already told him the first time he asked a nearly identical question that he can just delete any posts that are not up to his standards. And it's obvious that Mr. MacNee is dressed up as John Steed who is posing as a vicar to solve a case.

[quote="Low D"]Yah it's sort of a good example of what NOT to do, esp the separate photos with different lighting, different perspectives/sizes, different angles.[/quote]

I know you're just here for the mobbing opportunity, but whatever. I think it's a nice homage to classic spare 60's graphics and perfect for an Avengers TV show themed cover, but since you are obviously an expert on this sort of thing, I'm sure you could come up with a good example of what should have been done instead. There are plenty of photos of the Avengers TV show online if you want to give it a try.

[quote="DzM"][quote="leadshoes"][img]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50329758131_0eae509ea0.jpg[/img][/quote]
So I'm genuinely curious about your selection criteria (and this could be said for nearly all of the covers you share):

What about this cover has made you say "Yes. YES! THIS one is Good, or Classic, of Good & Classic!"?

I know nothing of the artist featured so have no personal attachment to it. Instead I'm judging it based purely on what's presented. It appears to be two unrelated over-contrasted publicity shots placed on paste-up board and some Letraset rub-on font in title-caps. For all intents and purposes this album cover, from a design and photography point of view, is nearly indistinguishable from dozens of other ~1960s era albums I've seen in the 50¢ bins at Goodwill. So what am I missing? Is there something about this genre or this cover in particular, that I'm overlooking? Please educate me.[/quote]

I've already basically answered this question from you before, so I really don't need to again, but what it boils down to is "different strokes for different folks." And I reckon a good single sleeve is as good of a record cover as an album cover. Anyway, after finding out that Diana Rigg had just passed away, I learned that Honor Blackman, who played John Steed/Patrick MacNee's previous cohort on the Avengers also died this year, and I remembered this reissue cover was a nice homage to the Avengers TV show and classic spare 60's graphics. It was a toss between this and the 12" version, which wouldn't be to your taste, either...

[img]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50332705767_8c3326a185.jpg[/img]

I'll also repeat that you can feel free to delete all non-album single or EP covers and any covers you deem not worthy of your high standards.

Whatever one thinks of the quality of it, it's the cover of a single rather than an album anyway. But the big question is why Mr MacNee is apparently dressed as a vicar.

Yah it's sort of a good example of what NOT to do, esp the separate photos with different lighting, different perspectives/sizes, different angles.

[quote="leadshoes"][img]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50329758131_0eae509ea0.jpg[/img][/quote]
So I'm genuinely curious about your selection criteria (and this could be said for nearly all of the covers you share):

What about this cover has made you say "Yes. YES! THIS one is Good, or Classic, of Good & Classic!"?

I know nothing of the artist featured so have no personal attachment to it. Instead I'm judging it based purely on what's presented. It appears to be two unrelated over-contrasted publicity shots placed on paste-up board and some Letraset rub-on font in title-caps. For all intents and purposes this album cover, from a design and photography point of view, is nearly indistinguishable from dozens of other ~1960s era albums I've seen in the 50¢ bins at Goodwill. So what am I missing? Is there something about this genre or this cover in particular, that I'm overlooking? Please educate me.