Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ General ‹ Shared Glory
  • Syndication
  • Change font size
  • FAQ
  • Members
  • Register
  • Login

Mumford & Sons

Post a reply

Question Which do you wear on your feet: shoes, gloves, scarf:
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   
  • Options

Expand view Topic review: Mumford & Sons

  • Quote cagliostro

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by cagliostro Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:44 am

Actually, I suspect their earlier gigs were better, and I don't see it as pretentious at all. You give a bit more when you are hungry. Then again, they were also trying out new equipment, and it seemed like the focus on the music may not have been as present as in the past.
Actually, I suspect their earlier gigs were better, and I don't see it as pretentious at all. You give a bit more when you are hungry. Then again, they were also trying out new equipment, and it seemed like the focus on the music may not have been as present as in the past.
  • Quote firehazard

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by firehazard Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:31 am

I would do that thing about how their early gigs were much better, before they got all trendy an' that, but I am concerned that it might appear pretentious. :wink:

They've always tended to have a bit of an odd mix in their audience. Be intriguing to see where they go next. Not at all sure.
I would do that thing about how their early gigs were much better, before they got all trendy an' that, but I am concerned that it might appear pretentious. :wink:

They've always tended to have a bit of an odd mix in their audience. Be intriguing to see where they go next. Not at all sure.
  • Quote cagliostro

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by cagliostro Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:11 pm

Okay, so I saw them live in Denver on Wednesday, and I must say I'm underwhelmed. I heard so much about how good their shows are, and it was fairly good, but I guess I expected more, which is my own fault. Things that may have gone against my experience that I cannot blame the law firm of Mumford & Sons for:
1. I didn't get much sleep the night before, and had to be at work at 5am.
2. There were idiot drunk girls who insisted on talking about how much they loved the band rather than actually listen to them. They spent most of the show taking pictures with their cell phone, texting their friends and yelling stupidities. And they were right next to us, and frequently bumping into us.
3. Opening act number 1 was pretty oddball, but especially entertaining (King Charles). Opening act number 2 (Cadillac Sky) annoyed me, and made me want to take a nap. They seemed a little too rehearsed. They had too many "hit your mark" moments (for example - okay, this guy is playing a solo - everybody crowd in close and watch while he plays). And the times for setup between bands was excruciating, which was probably due to me being up past my bedtime with little sleep and the idiots we shared the space with.
4. Moving now into the realm of more their fault, they had an elaborate lighting system set up, which I believe they said they were using for the first time. It was way too over the top and frequently distracted from the music, and seemed to distract them a bit, as I suspect at least some of the time they were paying a bit more attention to their new toys and less to the music, although it was still pretty solid.
5. There was not enough diversity from the album tracks to make the music as much fun to listen to. Seeing a live show should be a new experience, and I love bands/artists that put their heart and soul into their live shows and make them feel that much more meaningful by changing it up a bit. Of the shos I have seen, those especially guilty of this duty to their lives shows, and I thank them for it, is Tom Waits, the Eels, Bob Walkenhorst, and Robyn Hitchcock. Any of those artists are almost better live than recorded, especially Robyn Hitchcock.

Overall, the show was pretty good, and the songs I expected to be excited about hearing were delivered especially average, and the songs from the album I have had the least interest in were the ones that they actually changed up enough to make them interesting for the first time to me. Probably the most enjoyable were the new songs that, at least live, did not suffer from sounding like their other songs, which was my biggest complaint with their first album. I do find that sophomore efforts from bands whose debut I like tend to suck, so we'll see which direction they fall in. What I could hear from the Mumford stage banter impressed me, and I liked his attitude, while the keyboardist guy essentially just talked.

Also, I wore my Pogues shirt to their show, and while the bar staff commented on it, nobody else did, which shows that most M&S fans are not very sophisticated. :D
Okay, so I saw them live in Denver on Wednesday, and I must say I'm underwhelmed. I heard so much about how good their shows are, and it was fairly good, but I guess I expected more, which is my own fault. Things that may have gone against my experience that I cannot blame the law firm of Mumford & Sons for:
1. I didn't get much sleep the night before, and had to be at work at 5am.
2. There were idiot drunk girls who insisted on talking about how much they loved the band rather than actually listen to them. They spent most of the show taking pictures with their cell phone, texting their friends and yelling stupidities. And they were right next to us, and frequently bumping into us.
3. Opening act number 1 was pretty oddball, but especially entertaining (King Charles). Opening act number 2 (Cadillac Sky) annoyed me, and made me want to take a nap. They seemed a little too rehearsed. They had too many "hit your mark" moments (for example - okay, this guy is playing a solo - everybody crowd in close and watch while he plays). And the times for setup between bands was excruciating, which was probably due to me being up past my bedtime with little sleep and the idiots we shared the space with.
4. Moving now into the realm of more their fault, they had an elaborate lighting system set up, which I believe they said they were using for the first time. It was way too over the top and frequently distracted from the music, and seemed to distract them a bit, as I suspect at least some of the time they were paying a bit more attention to their new toys and less to the music, although it was still pretty solid.
5. There was not enough diversity from the album tracks to make the music as much fun to listen to. Seeing a live show should be a new experience, and I love bands/artists that put their heart and soul into their live shows and make them feel that much more meaningful by changing it up a bit. Of the shos I have seen, those especially guilty of this duty to their lives shows, and I thank them for it, is Tom Waits, the Eels, Bob Walkenhorst, and Robyn Hitchcock. Any of those artists are almost better live than recorded, especially Robyn Hitchcock.

Overall, the show was pretty good, and the songs I expected to be excited about hearing were delivered especially average, and the songs from the album I have had the least interest in were the ones that they actually changed up enough to make them interesting for the first time to me. Probably the most enjoyable were the new songs that, at least live, did not suffer from sounding like their other songs, which was my biggest complaint with their first album. I do find that sophomore efforts from bands whose debut I like tend to suck, so we'll see which direction they fall in. What I could hear from the Mumford stage banter impressed me, and I liked his attitude, while the keyboardist guy essentially just talked.

Also, I wore my Pogues shirt to their show, and while the bar staff commented on it, nobody else did, which shows that most M&S fans are not very sophisticated. :D
  • Quote PADDYgoesDUTCH

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by PADDYgoesDUTCH Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:19 pm

Villajohn wrote:YO!Paddy goes Feyenoord,greetings from Brum.Bach in the day sounds like a tribute to JOHANN SEBASTIAN himself.....however,back in the day i was more of a Shostakovich fan!I know this has bugger all to do with Mumford and sons,i have played their cd a few more times and i now like it even less.Call it a generation thing,but you can't fool some of the people all of the time[i said that].


:-)
[quote="Villajohn"]YO!Paddy goes Feyenoord,greetings from Brum.Bach in the day sounds like a tribute to JOHANN SEBASTIAN himself.....however,back in the day i was more of a Shostakovich fan!I know this has bugger all to do with Mumford and sons,i have played their cd a few more times and i now like it even less.Call it a generation thing,but you can't fool some of the people all of the time[i said that].[/quote]

:-)
  • Quote Kit Kat Kev

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Kit Kat Kev Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm

Re. Mumford and Sons,whats all the fuss about?A noughties version of McGuiness Flint or Ronnie Lanes Slim Chance, better then Mungo Jerry though!
Re. Mumford and Sons,whats all the fuss about?A noughties version of McGuiness Flint or Ronnie Lanes Slim Chance, better then Mungo Jerry though!
  • Quote Villajohn

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Villajohn Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:08 pm

YO!Paddy goes Feyenoord,greetings from Brum.Bach in the day sounds like a tribute to JOHANN SEBASTIAN himself.....however,back in the day i was more of a Shostakovich fan!I know this has bugger all to do with Mumford and sons,i have played their cd a few more times and i now like it even less.Call it a generation thing,but you can't fool some of the people all of the time[i said that].
YO!Paddy goes Feyenoord,greetings from Brum.Bach in the day sounds like a tribute to JOHANN SEBASTIAN himself.....however,back in the day i was more of a Shostakovich fan!I know this has bugger all to do with Mumford and sons,i have played their cd a few more times and i now like it even less.Call it a generation thing,but you can't fool some of the people all of the time[i said that].
  • Quote PADDYgoesDUTCH

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by PADDYgoesDUTCH Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:11 pm

Villajohn wrote:as a guest musician with the Greenland Whale Fishers .. poor Paddy had to play his squeezy thing in amongst the audience

hello VillaJohn, pleasure of meeting was all mine,
did you notice I kept my word and wrote this song BACH IN THE DAY as promised,
posted lyrics in GWF thread ages ago, hope you like 'em,
feel free to comment on the Englishness, if called for,
I am not a native speaker after all,
cheers man, PaddyGoesDutch aka DutchIrishBastard

ps. got a line up of me own together, we'll soon have a go at it
[quote="Villajohn"]as a guest musician with the Greenland Whale Fishers .. poor Paddy had to play his squeezy thing in amongst the audience[/quote]
hello VillaJohn, pleasure of meeting was all mine,
did you notice I kept my word and wrote this song BACH IN THE DAY as promised,
posted lyrics in GWF thread ages ago, hope you like 'em,
feel free to comment on the Englishness, if called for,
I am not a native speaker after all,
cheers man, PaddyGoesDutch aka DutchIrishBastard

ps. got a line up of me own together, we'll soon have a go at it
  • Quote cagliostro

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by cagliostro Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:34 pm

Fr. McGreer wrote:I have their album since i first heard 'Little Lion Man'. I have to say, i don't find enough in it to keep me interested during a complete play (do you find that it all sounds the same after the first few tracks?). However, when ANY of the tracks come up during a totally random playlist on the iPod, they ALL sound great.

When i saw them live, it was an amazingly intense gig and i'd love to see them again in a small venue.


Yeah, I've noticed it is better to hear them in short spurts instead of all at once, because the songs really do start sounding the same. But I've not sat down with the lyric sheet and given it a thorough listen either. Lyrics are important to me, and I've not been much knocked over by their lyrics. They do have an amazing driving sound, though. We'll see how the live show moves me.
[quote="Fr. McGreer"]
I have their album since i first heard [i]'Little Lion Man'[/i]. I have to say, i don't find enough in it to keep me interested during a complete play (do you find that it all sounds the same after the first few tracks?). However, when ANY of the tracks come up during a totally random playlist on the iPod, they ALL sound great.

When i saw them live, it was an amazingly intense gig and i'd love to see them again in a small venue.[/quote]

Yeah, I've noticed it is better to hear them in short spurts instead of all at once, because the songs really do start sounding the same. But I've not sat down with the lyric sheet and given it a thorough listen either. Lyrics are important to me, and I've not been much knocked over by their lyrics. They do have an amazing driving sound, though. We'll see how the live show moves me.
  • Quote Fr. McGreer

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Fr. McGreer Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:32 pm

PADDYgoesDUTCH wrote:bought the cd the other day, because of all the buzz here and elsewhere, but so far, I ain't impressed at all


I have their album since i first heard 'Little Lion Man'. I have to say, i don't find enough in it to keep me interested during a complete play (do you find that it all sounds the same after the first few tracks?). However, when ANY of the tracks come up during a totally random playlist on the iPod, they ALL sound great.

When i saw them live, it was an amazingly intense gig and i'd love to see them again in a small venue.
[quote="PADDYgoesDUTCH"]bought the cd the other day, because of all the buzz here and elsewhere, but so far, I ain't impressed at all[/quote]

I have their album since i first heard [i]'Little Lion Man'[/i]. I have to say, i don't find enough in it to keep me interested during a complete play (do you find that it all sounds the same after the first few tracks?). However, when ANY of the tracks come up during a totally random playlist on the iPod, they ALL sound great.

When i saw them live, it was an amazingly intense gig and i'd love to see them again in a small venue.
  • Quote Villajohn

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Villajohn Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:57 am

Paddy goes Butch played as a guest musician with the Greenland Whale Fishers gig in Birmingham last month,the size of the stage,bearing in mind GWF are a 7 piece band meant that poor Paddy had to play his squeezy thing in amongst the audience ,he and the GWF played a really good gig in front of about 5 men,3 women and 2 hamsters!At the venue i purchased 3 GWF cds for a tenner,absolute bargain.
Paddy goes Butch played as a guest musician with the Greenland Whale Fishers gig in Birmingham last month,the size of the stage,bearing in mind GWF are a 7 piece band meant that poor Paddy had to play his squeezy thing in amongst the audience ,he and the GWF played a really good gig in front of about 5 men,3 women and 2 hamsters!At the venue i purchased 3 GWF cds for a tenner,absolute bargain.
  • Quote Villajohn

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Villajohn Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:43 am

I like the Mumford and Sons album,but it is not the groundbreaking,this cd changed my life album that critics and the like will have us believe.When RED ROSES FOR ME was first released ,it never left my timetable for about 6 months,i have played the Steptoe,oops i mean Mumford cd about 6 maybe 7 times.Of the current genre of nouveau-folk-roots bands,Bellowhead are head and shoulders above anyone else,i did say CURRENT,The POGUES are still the guvnors!Great to hear from Mr.Irish B,how was your trip up North?Great meeting up with you at the Greenland Whale Fishers gig in Brum,at just about the worst venue i have ever been to BAR NONE.....
I like the Mumford and Sons album,but it is not the groundbreaking,this cd changed my life album that critics and the like will have us believe.When RED ROSES FOR ME was first released ,it never left my timetable for about 6 months,i have played the Steptoe,oops i mean Mumford cd about 6 maybe 7 times.Of the current genre of nouveau-folk-roots bands,Bellowhead are head and shoulders above anyone else,i did say CURRENT,The POGUES are still the guvnors!Great to hear from Mr.Irish B,how was your trip up North?Great meeting up with you at the Greenland Whale Fishers gig in Brum,at just about the worst venue i have ever been to BAR NONE.....
  • Quote PADDYgoesDUTCH

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by PADDYgoesDUTCH Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:08 pm

bought the cd the other day, because of all the buzz here and elsewhere, but so far, I ain't impressed at all
bought the cd the other day, because of all the buzz here and elsewhere, but so far, I ain't impressed at all
  • Quote Cdn Steve

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Cdn Steve Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:24 pm

cagliostro wrote:With all that said, I'm starting to feel like making a website of people who are sick of scalpers, and will buy extra tickets to sell them at the regular price they paid to fans.


Mumford & Sons are sold out for Vancouver as well. Here's a couple of replies to a Vancouver scalper on craigslist:

------------------------------------------------
RE:Mumford & Sons Floor Seats - $300 - $1 (van)
Date: 2010-09-12, 3:21PM PDT

you are the perfect example of everything that is wrong with our species
-----------------------------------------------

To: Mumford and Sons $300 - $300 (Vancouver)
Date: 2010-09-09, 1:14AM PDT

You're a true asshole.
---------------------------------------------
[quote="cagliostro"]
With all that said, I'm starting to feel like making a website of people who are sick of scalpers, and will buy extra tickets to sell them at the regular price they paid to fans.[/quote]

Mumford & Sons are sold out for Vancouver as well. Here's a couple of replies to a Vancouver scalper on craigslist:

------------------------------------------------
RE:Mumford & Sons Floor Seats - $300 - $1 (van)
Date: 2010-09-12, 3:21PM PDT

you are the perfect example of everything that is wrong with our species
-----------------------------------------------

To: Mumford and Sons $300 - $300 (Vancouver)
Date: 2010-09-09, 1:14AM PDT

You're a true asshole.
---------------------------------------------
  • Quote cagliostro

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by cagliostro Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:21 pm

I need to pick up my tickets for the Eels, but surprisingly the wife was especially excited about Mumford and Sons and decided we needed to go see them together, which has been a rarity for us to attend a concert together. So, we paid the scalpers for the sold out show (bastards!) and found a sitter, and have the next day off work. Anything else barring us from seeing this show is nothing we can control. Ready....go!

With all that said, I'm starting to feel like making a website of people who are sick of scalpers, and will buy extra tickets to sell them at the regular price they paid to fans.
I need to pick up my tickets for the Eels, but surprisingly the wife was especially excited about Mumford and Sons and decided we needed to go see them together, which has been a rarity for us to attend a concert together. So, we paid the scalpers for the sold out show (bastards!) and found a sitter, and have the next day off work. Anything else barring us from seeing this show is nothing we can control. Ready....go!

With all that said, I'm starting to feel like making a website of people who are sick of scalpers, and will buy extra tickets to sell them at the regular price they paid to fans.
  • Quote James

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by James Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:42 pm

Bands I would see at V:

Paul Weller, Madness, the Coral, Kasabian, The Prodigy, Jamie T, the Divine Comedy, Eels, Amy MacDonald, The Saw Doctors, Shaun Ryder, Kate Nash, Example, the Charlatans and Paul Heaton.

Actually, that's a really good set of bands. You're a lucky girl.
Bands I would see at V:

Paul Weller, Madness, the Coral, Kasabian, The Prodigy, Jamie T, the Divine Comedy, Eels, Amy MacDonald, The Saw Doctors, Shaun Ryder, Kate Nash, Example, the Charlatans and Paul Heaton.

Actually, that's a really good set of bands. You're a lucky girl.

Top

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB
Content © copyright the original authors unless otherwise indicated