Clash reunion???

by **TheDanielOfBrisbane** Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:06 pm

I think this was/is bullshit....Accfording to a couple of Aussie music forums, this was an April fool's joke gone awry that pops its head up again every now and again.

by **Caukill** Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:07 pm

Roddyruddy wrote:Have heard the bootleg "Friday Night Saturday Morning" 1985 York & Newcastle of that busking tour.

I'm from York originally but alas wasn't around for that , i know a couple of people who swear they went for a drink with Joe later.

by **RoddyRuddy** Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:20 pm

Caukill wrote:haven't seen anything else on this so as others have pointed out it does look like a hoax / chinese whisper kind of thing .
Obviously it's something a lot of folk have very strong, emotional views on . For me i have no problem with Mick , Paul & Topper on the same stage even if it's with another singer , i still think it'd be worth seeing , and i would pay for the privelige - i'm okay with this because i'm not expecting to see 'The Clash'. An 'interesting' show ? Probably. The Clash? No.
I started going to gigs regular when i was 13 in 1982 but never had the opportunity to see The Clash. I was fortunate enough to catch Joe on his 'Class War' (?) busking tour outside a gig at Leeds Universtiy and i still remember me & a friend climbing a tree for a better view. To this day i have no recollection of which gig but i do remember hanging in the tree for dear life!

Have heard the bootleg "Friday Night Saturday Morning" 1985 York & Newcastle of that busking tour.

by **Caukill** Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:52 pm

haven't seen anything else on this so as others have pointed out it does look like a hoax / chinese whisper kind of thing .
Obviously it's something a lot of folk have very strong, emotional views on . For me i have no problem with Mick , Paul & Topper on the same stage even if it's with another singer , i still think it'd be worth seeing , and i would pay for the privelige - i'm okay with this because i'm not expecting to see 'The Clash'. An 'interesting' show ? Probably. The Clash? No.
I started going to gigs regular when i was 13 in 1982 but never had the opportunity to see The Clash. I was fortunate enough to catch Joe on his 'Class War' (?) busking tour outside a gig at Leeds Universtiy and i still remember me & a friend climbing a tree for a better view. To this day i have no recollection of which gig but i do remember hanging in the tree for dear life!

by **Pyro** Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:19 pm

Simon: Uh, I must admit that to decipher your post was really interesting. Commas could work well:-)

And in context of other thread - maybe it would be like Johnny Cash without Johnny Cash:-)

by **Simon Maguire** Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:57 pm

Bottom line A tour without the lead singer is shite, The Clash without Joe Thin Lizzy without Phil, Queen Without Freddie, The Pogues without Shane did it really work I know alot of the time it's because of the money but shit for the fans can you imagine U2 without Bono or Oasis without Noel or Liam Shit.

by **Irishman** Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:15 am

What's the point of a reunion without Joe? The original members never would do anything to harm Joe's stature in the band so theres never gonna be a reunion.

They figure the band should go sometime and the Clash went with Joe.

R.I.P. Joe (Your missed)

by **Paulie** Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:46 am

sorry, I think Tim is NOT a good choice, wrong style,wrong period, wrong almost everything but maybe if Paul from the Jam was fronting..I MIGHT go see the Clash tribute band on tour.....

by **Guest** Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:12 am

The Clash without Joe(R.I.P.) .that would be B.A.D. even in Havana

by **bored and violent** Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:57 pm

I'd probably go if there was a show here...

by **Desiderius** Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:25 am

Mick Molloy wrote:
Desiderius wrote:
Caukill wrote:maybe they feel it's their last roll of the dice to put on a valid performance

or to gather as much cash as they can

Well speaking of that: why are the Pogues doing reunions? It's all about the money and we as fans are grateful enough to pay a lot of money to see bands that played 20 years ago.

However, Shane is still alive (*enter some corny joke about it*), and I don't feel cheated.

Anyway, this is just my opinion and I ain't looking for a fight of any kind, don't get me wrong.

by **Caukill** Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:49 pm

Mick Molloy wrote:
Desiderius wrote:
Caukill wrote:maybe they feel it's their last roll of the dice to put on a valid performance

or to gather as much cash as they can

Well speaking of that: why are the Pogues doing reunions? It's all about the money and we as fans are grateful enough to pay a lot of money to see bands that played 20 years ago.

Absolutely. I've just payed £35 for a ticket to see the Pogues @ Xmas - do i begrudge it? No. Money well spent , everyone is happy.
Even Joe Strummer had to make a living! I'm pretty certain Joe must have sanctioned the use of 'Should i stay or should i go' to Levis for their commercial but it in turn it meant more people checked out the work of the Clash.
If Paul, Mick & Topper wanna go out on the road and play some Clash songs with a different singer then who are we to argue? They've earned the right.
One last thing; anyone who thinks the Clash was just about Joe is very mistaken.

by **trashcity** Fri Oct 21, 2005 5:02 pm

I'm pretty sure this is bullshit. Paul is happy painting, Mick has his production and a new band with Tony James he's busy with and Topper is getting on with his life in Dover.
Remember folks, The Clash turned down all those $$$$$$$$$$$$$$'s to reform while Joe was alive so why they'd do it now with Tim Amrstrong(who seems like a good guy, i hasten to add) is way beyond me. I'd put money on it not happening.

I think anyones closest chance to seeing a reformed Clash now is by checking out "The Last Night London Burned" film, which will bring a lump to anyones throat.

by **Mick Molloy** Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:03 pm

Desiderius wrote:
Caukill wrote:maybe they feel it's their last roll of the dice to put on a valid performance

or to gather as much cash as they can

Well speaking of that: why are the Pogues doing reunions? It's all about the money and we as fans are grateful enough to pay a lot of money to see bands that played 20 years ago.

by **Desiderius** Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:58 pm

Caukill wrote:maybe they feel it's their last roll of the dice to put on a valid performance

or to gather as much cash as they can

Clash reunion???

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Clash reunion???

punked out