Manchester Underperformance !

Post a reply

Question Which do you wear on your feet: shoes, gloves, scarf:
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Manchester Underperformance !

Re: Manchester Underperformance !

Post by Texas Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:27 pm

Looking back it really was p*** poor! "007 was much better though, so keep the head of steam going in 2008! (and maybe this thread as well)

Post by MacRua Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:05 am

Thank, Jim, for you notice but:
DzM wrote:These fora are not here to provide only positive feedback about the band and its members - the fora are here for fans to have open and honest conversations. Sometimes those conversations will be critical of the people we admire, but freedom means being able to say unpopular things.


On my behalf I can add - better they let off steam here than lay an ambush with baseball bat somewhere in the dark alley ;)

Post by Jim Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:53 am

Moderator - Is it possible to lock this thread so it fades into the forum? I do not see the point in debating one show that was below the normal superb standard over three months after it took place.

Regards,
Jim (who only wrote this after checking it will be back to the position it is now very shortly due to postings about the new US shows)

Post by Dropofpoison Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:11 pm

Anonymous wrote:MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.


Every band has the odd gig where it doesn't go right. Ones of Shanes best mates had just died, which might have put him off somewhat.

Post by Niall Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:09 pm

KeithWillis wrote:Ok it wasnt the best show of the tour, but to suggest you left after only 4 songs is probably an over exaggeration of what you actually did!


maybe he did? 60 quid, he musta been watching christina aguilera. no wonder he thought it was shit

Post by KeithWillis Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:49 pm

Ok it wasnt the best show of the tour, but to suggest you left after only 4 songs is probably an over exaggeration of what you actually did!

Post by DownInTheGround Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:24 pm

philipchevron wrote:
Anonymous wrote:MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.


Not all reviews make the overnight editions.


I thought this issue was dead and buried. Unfortunatley it takes some longer to gauge an opinion. And it was stupid to leave after four numbers, you are to blame for the waste. It was not the greatest show, but was still enjoyable, leave after four numbers, what a 'FUC****' stupid thing to do.

Post by philipchevron Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:07 pm

Anonymous wrote:MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.


Not all reviews make the overnight editions.

Post by Guest Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:55 pm

MEN ARENA DEC 2006 WHAT A WASTE OF £60. THE POGUES WERE FUC**** SHI**. WE LEFT AFTER THE 4 NUMBER AS IT WAS TO PAINFULL TO WATCH. WHY DO THE BAND PUT UP WITH THAT FUC**** WASTER SHANE ANY WAY.

Post by Guest Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:29 pm

Can we go there then?

Nice one guys :P :P

Post by Mark_Wafc Sat Jan 06, 2007 4:46 pm

Nancy wrote:
Anonymous wrote:the arena is better because its a big gig. 1500 PEOPLE.


Is that a lot?

You would fit more in Brannigans. :lol:


Ha ha , i was thinking the same thing!

Be a fair rush for tickets for that one!

Post by Nancy Sat Jan 06, 2007 4:25 pm

Anonymous wrote:the arena is better because its a big gig. 1500 PEOPLE.


Is that a lot?

You would fit more in Brannigans. :lol:

Post by soulfinger Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:39 pm

Bellabog wrote:
soulfinger wrote:Perhaps you're giving Manchester its full name. Like Ashton-under-Lyne......

Manchester-under-Pants....I think it's got a certain je ne sais quoi


Ashton-under-lyne is sadly lacking any je ne sais quoi, however....


True, true ............it just has "quoi".

Post by Guest Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:16 pm

the arena is better because its a big gig. 1500 PEOPLE.

Post by Bellabog Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:54 am

soulfinger wrote:Perhaps you're giving Manchester its full name. Like Ashton-under-Lyne......

Manchester-under-Pants....I think it's got a certain je ne sais quoi


Ashton-under-lyne is sadly lacking any je ne sais quoi, however....

Top


Powered by phpBB
Content © copyright the original authors unless otherwise indicated