Statistics

Post a reply

Question Which do you wear on your feet: shoes, gloves, scarf:
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Statistics

Re: Statistics

Post by Eckhard Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:55 pm

philipchevron wrote:
Eckhard wrote:Good Evening.

I am not sure, if this is the right "Sub-Forum", but:

Did any anybody ever mention the fact that the reunion phase of the Pogues is already very longer than the phase of nonexistence?

1996-2001: Five years

2001-now: eight years and going on.


...........which is also twice as long as the original duration of the "classic line-up"



Indeed. But for the "Years without Shane"-Phase, I am not certain which dates to take:

1991-1996: Already beaten by the reunion, but

1991-2001: two more years

Re: Statistics

Post by philipchevron Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:39 pm

Eckhard wrote:Good Evening.

I am not sure, if this is the right "Sub-Forum", but:

Did any anybody ever mention the fact that the reunion phase of the Pogues is already very longer than the phase of nonexistence?

1996-2001: Five years

2001-now: eight years and going on.


...........which is also twice as long as the original duration of the "classic line-up"

Re: Statistics

Post by Heather Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:37 pm

No. :wink:

Statistics

Post by Eckhard Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:34 pm

Good Evening.

I am not sure, if this is the right "Sub-Forum", but:

Did any anybody ever mention the fact that the reunion phase of the Pogues is already very longer than the phase of nonexistence?

1996-2001: Five years

2001-now: eight years and going on.

Top


Powered by phpBB
Content © copyright the original authors unless otherwise indicated