Skip to content


Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ The Pogues ‹ Live shows
  • Syndication
  • Change font size
  • FAQ
  • Members
  • Register
  • Login

The Pogues without Shane

Post a reply

Question Which do you wear on your feet: shoes, gloves, scarf:
This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   
  • Options

Expand view Topic review: The Pogues without Shane

  • Quote Billy

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by Billy Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:59 pm

Wow, nothing like a controversial topic to get everyone up in arms...

I have seen the Pogues together with Shane and then Shane without the rest of the Pogues. One thing is for sure, as any working artist will tell you, having a band like the Pogues or for example the Grateful Dead, or an artist such as Johnny Cash etc... is a special thing, a rare thing, you can be a great and gifted musician, singer, writer and your work never see the light of day. There is also the difference between box office and great work, just because you have one does not mean you have or can have the other. U2 is a good example of this, good musicians, can play well, great box office and some memorable work, but ultimately thin, good as a beer once you drink it, just an empty glass, a real business. Or the Dropkick Murphy’s, they have good songs, lots of fun, but not gems by any means. To have it all come together, the training, the talent, being gifted, in the right place at the right time and to have been in a position and to grab the opportunity and have it give birth to something special is simply rare.

Analysis wise... I.E. my 2 cents...

Live Performance - is focused more on the music than the words, while I never saw a Shane-less Pogues play live I did see Shane perform without the rest of the Pogues and with the music as the focus it was lacking - but Shane has the it factor and so it was still riveting. See (hearing) Shane play Spancil Hill with Christy Moore was near as good as anything the he did with the rest of the Pogues although it is not an apples to apples comparison. The Pogues as a group are special one of a kind but still with Christy Moore and this song the rendition was special in its own right and Shane was really great -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iUEwB4ME3I - see for yourself

The Album - is more focused on the words as I sit and listen along, again, with the Pogues, not quite a fair comparison because Shane and the band were all at the peak of their creativity, all in all then the albums with them all together are great works, the ones Shane did solo (Crock of Gold etc...) were, from a lyric POV still quite amazing vs. the rest of the Pogues without Shane, well the albums were as lacking as Shane’s live Performance without them. And Shane's albums without the music of the rest of the Pogues were not a complete experience.

Two things I find incredible, first, this group together and the albums they produced are gems, and the band is as great and gifted with the playing as Shane is with the writing and the singing. Second, I saw the group in 1987 for the first time at the Vic in Chicago and they were really great, the next time I saw them was 2007 at the Congress in Chicago, and could not believe it but they were better, perhaps although in 87 at their creative peak but in 07 more seasoned, perhaps I don't remember so well, in 07 it was pure magic in part because I never thought I would ever see them together again, let alone 20 years later. In those 20 years I was married, had 4 children, went broke, on Welfare, and staring at the abyss climbed out of my fall from grace with God with the help of a simple twist of fate, I am not entirely sure I deserved and became (if money is the mark) very successful. I am grateful for this band, as a kid my Father and I saw the Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem at the Civic Opera house in Chicago (our Carnegie Hall) in 1971 - the last time the boys played together. Things went bad with my Family in the years later, several key deaths, car accidents etc. after that and the next thing I know I am at the Vic in 1987 and they start playing Dirty Old Town. It tore me apart; near brought me to my knees and in a way brought something back that I forgot about actually, something long ago assumed dead and never to return.

The Pogues to me together are like Water, what is Water, It is about rebirth, and new beginning, and it always reinvents itself. For the part the Pogues played in my life supporting and affirming that rebirth that shot of pure life I am sincerely grateful.

“I woke up one morning feeling awful, I was young then”
Dante and The Lobster
Beckett as read by Barry McGovern

“You must go on, that's all I know - …I can't go on - You must go on… I'll go on”.
Beckett – The Unnamable

I now I would like nothing more than to be just a regular Joe, not sure it's in the cards though...
Wow, nothing like a controversial topic to get everyone up in arms...

I have seen the Pogues together with Shane and then Shane without the rest of the Pogues. One thing is for sure, as any working artist will tell you, having a band like the Pogues or for example the Grateful Dead, or an artist such as Johnny Cash etc... is a special thing, a rare thing, you can be a great and gifted musician, singer, writer and your work never see the light of day. There is also the difference between box office and great work, just because you have one does not mean you have or can have the other. U2 is a good example of this, good musicians, can play well, great box office and some memorable work, but ultimately thin, good as a beer once you drink it, just an empty glass, a real business. Or the Dropkick Murphy’s, they have good songs, lots of fun, but not gems by any means. To have it all come together, the training, the talent, being gifted, in the right place at the right time and to have been in a position and to grab the opportunity and have it give birth to something special is simply rare.

Analysis wise... I.E. my 2 cents...

Live Performance - is focused more on the music than the words, while I never saw a Shane-less Pogues play live I did see Shane perform without the rest of the Pogues and with the music as the focus it was lacking - but Shane has the it factor and so it was still riveting. See (hearing) Shane play Spancil Hill with Christy Moore was near as good as anything the he did with the rest of the Pogues although it is not an apples to apples comparison. The Pogues as a group are special one of a kind but still with Christy Moore and this song the rendition was special in its own right and Shane was really great -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iUEwB4ME3I - see for yourself

The Album - is more focused on the words as I sit and listen along, again, with the Pogues, not quite a fair comparison because Shane and the band were all at the peak of their creativity, all in all then the albums with them all together are great works, the ones Shane did solo (Crock of Gold etc...) were, from a lyric POV still quite amazing vs. the rest of the Pogues without Shane, well the albums were as lacking as Shane’s live Performance without them. And Shane's albums without the music of the rest of the Pogues were not a complete experience.

Two things I find incredible, first, this group together and the albums they produced are gems, and the band is as great and gifted with the playing as Shane is with the writing and the singing. Second, I saw the group in 1987 for the first time at the Vic in Chicago and they were really great, the next time I saw them was 2007 at the Congress in Chicago, and could not believe it but they were better, perhaps although in 87 at their creative peak but in 07 more seasoned, perhaps I don't remember so well, in 07 it was pure magic in part because I never thought I would ever see them together again, let alone 20 years later. In those 20 years I was married, had 4 children, went broke, on Welfare, and staring at the abyss climbed out of my fall from grace with God with the help of a simple twist of fate, I am not entirely sure I deserved and became (if money is the mark) very successful. I am grateful for this band, as a kid my Father and I saw the Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem at the Civic Opera house in Chicago (our Carnegie Hall) in 1971 - the last time the boys played together. Things went bad with my Family in the years later, several key deaths, car accidents etc. after that and the next thing I know I am at the Vic in 1987 and they start playing Dirty Old Town. It tore me apart; near brought me to my knees and in a way brought something back that I forgot about actually, something long ago assumed dead and never to return.

The Pogues to me together are like Water, what is Water, It is about rebirth, and new beginning, and it always reinvents itself. For the part the Pogues played in my life supporting and affirming that rebirth that shot of pure life I am sincerely grateful.

“I woke up one morning feeling awful, I was young then”
Dante and The Lobster
Beckett as read by Barry McGovern

“You must go on, that's all I know - …I can't go on - You must go on… I'll go on”.
Beckett – The Unnamable

I now I would like nothing more than to be just a regular Joe, not sure it's in the cards though...
  • Quote darrencp22

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by darrencp22 Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:07 pm

I have little interest in seeing the band without Shane... BUT I also have little interest in seeing Shane without the Pogues. I'm a Pogues fan.. and that means all the guys. Some of my fav songs are non-shane songs. My fav by far is Thousands are Sailing. It hits home for someone who grew up in an Irish neighborhood in NYC.. it's very visual and I can imagine what my ancestors might have experienced. Another is Young Ned of The Hill. It was a great chemistry which led to great song writing and great muscianship. Any part missing and it just doesn't work the same.

My first show will be in March and I can't wait. BTW, somewhat surprised people would humor this guy.. he's obviously here just to push buttons.
I have little interest in seeing the band without Shane... BUT I also have little interest in seeing Shane without the Pogues. I'm a Pogues fan.. and that means all the guys. Some of my fav songs are non-shane songs. My fav by far is Thousands are Sailing. It hits home for someone who grew up in an Irish neighborhood in NYC.. it's very visual and I can imagine what my ancestors might have experienced. Another is Young Ned of The Hill. It was a great chemistry which led to great song writing and great muscianship. Any part missing and it just doesn't work the same.

My first show will be in March and I can't wait. BTW, somewhat surprised people would humor this guy.. he's obviously here just to push buttons.
  • Quote Smoz

Re: DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included

Post by Smoz Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:42 am

philipchevron wrote:
mats wrote:
philipchevron wrote:The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.


Only until there´s an official release of a live show with Joe Strummer. You´ve mentioned this before, are there still plans for a live album?


Eventually. We have yet to schedule the The Pogues with Joe Strummer: Live in London 1991 album.



You do know just how to tease us, then leave us hanging.
[quote="philipchevron"][quote="mats"][quote="philipchevron"]The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.[/quote]

Only until there´s an official release of a live show with Joe Strummer. You´ve mentioned this before, are there still plans for a live album?[/quote]

Eventually. We have yet to schedule the [i]The Pogues with Joe Strummer: Live in London 1991[/i] album.[/quote]


You do know just how to tease us, then leave us hanging.
  • Quote philipchevron

Re: DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included

Post by philipchevron Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:16 pm

mats wrote:
philipchevron wrote:The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.


Only until there´s an official release of a live show with Joe Strummer. You´ve mentioned this before, are there still plans for a live album?


Eventually. We have yet to schedule the The Pogues with Joe Strummer: Live in London 1991 album.
[quote="mats"][quote="philipchevron"]The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.[/quote]

Only until there´s an official release of a live show with Joe Strummer. You´ve mentioned this before, are there still plans for a live album?[/quote]

Eventually. We have yet to schedule the [i]The Pogues with Joe Strummer: Live in London 1991[/i] album.
  • Quote mats

Re: DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included

Post by mats Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:57 pm

philipchevron wrote:The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.


Only until there´s an official release of a live show with Joe Strummer. You´ve mentioned this before, are there still plans for a live album?
[quote="philipchevron"]The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.[/quote]

Only until there´s an official release of a live show with Joe Strummer. You´ve mentioned this before, are there still plans for a live album?
  • Quote philipchevron

Re: DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included

Post by philipchevron Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:51 am

PaulMcC wrote:
gerrybhoy wrote:i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.



Thanks, you reminded me! I saw The Pogues with Mr. Strummer in The National Stadium in '91. They blew me away. If the brain serves me well, they did a killer version of 'Brand New Cadillac' and an even more killer take on 'Straight To Hell'. I have an unlicensed cassette recording of the show somewhere which I must dust off.


The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.
[quote="PaulMcC"][quote="gerrybhoy"]i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.[/quote]


Thanks, you reminded me! I saw The Pogues with Mr. Strummer in The National Stadium in '91. They blew me away. If the brain serves me well, they did a killer version of 'Brand New Cadillac' and an even more killer take on 'Straight To Hell'. I have an unlicensed cassette recording of the show somewhere which I must dust off.[/quote]

The unlicensed recording in question appears to be the standard bootleg of Pogues/Joe which is a bit of a shame as there were better gigs by far.
  • Quote gerrybhoy

Re: DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included

Post by gerrybhoy Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 pm

PaulMcC wrote:
gerrybhoy wrote:i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.



Thanks, you reminded me! I saw The Pogues with Mr. Strummer in The National Stadium in '91. They blew me away. If the brain serves me well, they did a killer version of 'Brand New Cadillac' and an even more killer take on 'Straight To Hell'. I have an unlicensed cassette recording of the show somewhere which I must dust off.


Paul

I recall Joe and Spider sharing lead vocals on songs such as "if i should fall" and "turkish song of the damned" which were out of this world, at least with a non shane pogues gig you knew what you were getting - pure quality
[quote="PaulMcC"][quote="gerrybhoy"]i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.[/quote]


Thanks, you reminded me! I saw The Pogues with Mr. Strummer in The National Stadium in '91. They blew me away. If the brain serves me well, they did a killer version of 'Brand New Cadillac' and an even more killer take on 'Straight To Hell'. I have an unlicensed cassette recording of the show somewhere which I must dust off.[/quote]

Paul

I recall Joe and Spider sharing lead vocals on songs such as "if i should fall" and "turkish song of the damned" which were out of this world, at least with a non shane pogues gig you knew what you were getting - pure quality
  • Quote PaulMcC

Re: DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included

Post by PaulMcC Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:14 pm

gerrybhoy wrote:i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.



Thanks, you reminded me! I saw The Pogues with Mr. Strummer in The National Stadium in '91. They blew me away. If the brain serves me well, they did a killer version of 'Brand New Cadillac' and an even more killer take on 'Straight To Hell'. I have an unlicensed cassette recording of the show somewhere which I must dust off.
[quote="gerrybhoy"]i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.[/quote]


Thanks, you reminded me! I saw The Pogues with Mr. Strummer in The National Stadium in '91. They blew me away. If the brain serves me well, they did a killer version of 'Brand New Cadillac' and an even more killer take on 'Straight To Hell'. I have an unlicensed cassette recording of the show somewhere which I must dust off.
  • Quote gerrybhoy

DATES: September - October, 2010 (with new band included!)

Post by gerrybhoy Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:00 pm

i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.
i was lucky enough to have been to about 5 or 6 pogues gigs (without shane) early 90s and it must be said they were superb with spider doing lead vocals, there was one gig at the edinburgh playhouse around 93 when joe strummer was in the band and it has to be my best ever "non shane" gig. I love the pogues with or without shane and in my opinion pogue mahone and waiting for herb were very much underated.
  • Quote Kendra

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by Kendra Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:47 am

Ignatius Giddy wrote:It is odd how some people can belittle such a unique and majesterial group of musicians such as The Pogues. It is NOT Shane and The Pogues, it is The Pogues including Shane, an indivisible unit. It is true that most fans want to see the entire unit live and to hear it on record, especially those who have been around since the early days. It just seems sad that sometimes Shane behaves as if he doesn't want to be there.

Oh! You keep changing your names as often as your views, don't you, Andy? :)
Didn't you say "I used to love The Pogues but I am now bored with them. They are a nostalgia act." at facebook group not so long ago? Gonna crash any of their gigs during the UK tour? ;)
[quote="Ignatius Giddy"]It is odd how some people can belittle such a unique and majesterial group of musicians such as The Pogues. It is NOT Shane and The Pogues, it is The Pogues including Shane, an indivisible unit. It is true that most fans want to see the entire unit live and to hear it on record, especially those who have been around since the early days. It just seems sad that sometimes Shane behaves as if he doesn't want to be there.[/quote]
Oh! You keep changing your names as often as your views, don't you, Andy? :)
Didn't you say "I used to love The Pogues but I am now bored with them. They are a nostalgia act." at facebook group not so long ago? Gonna crash any of their gigs during the UK tour? ;)
  • Quote Ignatius Giddy

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by Ignatius Giddy Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:06 pm

It is odd how some people can belittle such a unique and majesterial group of musicians such as The Pogues. It is NOT Shane and The Pogues, it is The Pogues including Shane, an indivisible unit. It is true that most fans want to see the entire unit live and to hear it on record, especially those who have been around since the early days. It just seems sad that sometimes Shane behaves as if he doesn't want to be there.
It is odd how some people can belittle such a unique and majesterial group of musicians such as The Pogues. It is NOT Shane and The Pogues, it is The Pogues including Shane, an indivisible unit. It is true that most fans want to see the entire unit live and to hear it on record, especially those who have been around since the early days. It just seems sad that sometimes Shane behaves as if he doesn't want to be there.
  • Quote mekongwhiskey

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by mekongwhiskey Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:01 pm

I can't say I wouldn't be extremely disappointed if Shane would have been a no-show at our concert at Club Nokia in L.A. last month, but when he disappeared after encore #1 and Spidey took over, he and the band did their usual smash up, trouser tearing, rousing renditions that could have woken the dead. With Philip, Spider and Andrew as alternate helmsmen, I'd say they have quite a lethal vocal crew. So, would I have payed 80 bucks to experience a Shaneless Pogues? Absolutely.
I can't say I wouldn't be extremely disappointed if Shane would have been a no-show at our concert at Club Nokia in L.A. last month, but when he disappeared after encore #1 and Spidey took over, he and the band did their usual smash up, trouser tearing, rousing renditions that could have woken the dead. With Philip, Spider and Andrew as alternate helmsmen, I'd say they have quite a lethal vocal crew. So, would I have payed 80 bucks to experience a Shaneless Pogues? Absolutely.
  • Quote philipchevron

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by philipchevron Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:15 am

Chris C wrote:
If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?


To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.

Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.

I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.

The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.


And with Chris's post, the defence rests.
[quote="Chris C"][quote]If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?[/quote]

To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.

Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.

I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.

The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.[/quote]

And with Chris's post, the defence rests.
  • Quote Chris C

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by Chris C Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:08 am

If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?


To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.

Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.

I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.

The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.
[quote]If The Pogues did a tour without shane with Spider on vocals how many people would go to see them?[/quote]

To answer the original question, I can speak to my own decisions. Shane and the Popes came to Dallas, where I live, in about 2000. They played at a club called Trees with a capacity of about 700. I don't recall the ticket price, but I think it was in the $20-$30 range. I decided not to go, being more of Pogues fan than a Popes fan. Turns out, Shane didn't attend the gig. The Popes played without him.

Fast forward 9 or so years, and the Pogues come to town, $55 for a ticket at the 1200 person capacity House of Blues. Putting on my consumer hat, I considered that, given Shane's non appearance last time he was to play Dallas, I might be spending an evening listening to a Shaneless Pogues . I did purchase that ticket. Money very well spent by the way.

I found a review of the Pope's show in Dallas - even without Shane, they played Pogues songs.

The Pogues are like any great band (I don't use the term great lightly), they are more than the sum of their parts. Yeah, Shane is the 'front man', but clearly the Pogues are much more than his backing band.
  • Quote keithwillis2uk

Re: The Pogues without Shane

Post by keithwillis2uk Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:17 pm

Unbelievable some of the posts here. The Pogues are a collection of exceptional musicians who all contribute to the band in their own ways. As a pure songwriter Shane can not be beaten, and i have followed this band since around 1985 and been to 100's of their shows. These days i could not imagine going to a show and not hearing the likes of '1000's are sailing', 'Repeal of the licensing laws' or 'Tuesday Morning'. At the moment i cannot think of any other band who can produce performances like The Pogues. I just can't?
Unbelievable some of the posts here. The Pogues are a collection of exceptional musicians who all contribute to the band in their own ways. As a pure songwriter Shane can not be beaten, and i have followed this band since around 1985 and been to 100's of their shows. These days i could not imagine going to a show and not hearing the likes of '1000's are sailing', 'Repeal of the licensing laws' or 'Tuesday Morning'. At the moment i cannot think of any other band who can produce performances like The Pogues. I just can't?

Top

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB
Content © copyright the original authors unless otherwise indicated