by philipchevron Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:29 pm
Kriss wrote:DownInTheGround wrote:What a strange question......any reason for wanting to know?
No particular reason at all. It just seemed that depending on the picture everyone was either failrly close in height or that Shane was a good bit taller than everyone else.
It's tricky photographing a group of 8 people. Photographers over the years have sought to keep it interesting with varying perspectives, lenses etc. Some of these have a distorting affect, seen most notably on something like the cover of "Essential Pogues" (Island, 1991).
[quote="Kriss"][quote="DownInTheGround"]What a strange question......any reason for wanting to know?[/quote]
No particular reason at all. It just seemed that depending on the picture everyone was either failrly close in height or that Shane was a good bit taller than everyone else.[/quote]
It's tricky photographing a group of 8 people. Photographers over the years have sought to keep it interesting with varying perspectives, lenses etc. Some of these have a distorting affect, seen most notably on something like the cover of "Essential Pogues" (Island, 1991).
